A TEXT POST

Headlines: “‘Jerusalem’ Comes Out Of Dem Platform Language”

Politico: “‘Jerusalem’ Comes Out Of Dem Platform Language”

http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/09/jerusalem-comes-out-of-dem-platform-language-134318.html

The language in the section of the Democratic Party platform on Israel has changed from 2008 until now, most notably as relates to Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish State


Politico: “Jerusalem Capital Plank Not Included In DNC Platform”

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/09/jerusalem-capital-plank-not-included-in-dnc-platform-134317.html

Language calling for Jerusalem to be recognized as the capital of Israel has been omitted from the 2012 Democratic Party platform. As the Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper noted, the 2008 DNC platform included this language proclaiming the city’s status: “Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel. The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.” That language has been replaced by a broader statement about unshakable U.S. support for the Jewish state - with no mention of Jerusalem at all. The statement also omits previously included language about Palestinian refugees and the designed terrorist group Hamas.


Washington Free Beacon: “Pro-Israel Language Removed From Democratic Party Platform”

http://freebeacon.com/pro-israel-language-removed-from-democratic-party-platform/

Several pro-Israel sections of the 2008 Democratic Party platform have been removed from the 2012 platform-on Jerusalem, Palestinian refugees, and Hamas. The new platform represents another shift by the Obama Democrats toward the Palestinian position on key issues in the peace process. For Jerusalem, the new platform has been brought into line with the Obama administration’s policy of not recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and supporting its division. Jerusalem is unmentioned in the 2012 document, whereas the 2008 and 2004 Democratic Party platforms declared “Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel…It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.” The Obama administration’s refusal to recognize Jerusalem has been a point of significant controversy in recent months.


Weekly Standard: “Dems. Remove Pro-Israel Language From Party Platform”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dems-remove-pro-israel-language-party-platform_651611.html

In the 2008 Democratic party platform, there was this language on Jerusalem, Israel: Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel. The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. This year, however, that language has been removed. Indeed, there is no mention of Jerusalem in the 2012 party platform adopted by Democrats.

A VIDEO

On CNBC’s “Closing Bell” Maria Bartiromo asks Gene Sperling why the WH has not passed a budget

A VIDEO

Last night, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz insisted that it was “simply not true” that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has refused to bring a budget to the Senate floor. Maybe she should have checked to see what Reid actually said: he doesn’t plan to bring a budget to the floor this year and the White House is just fine with that.

In February, Sen. Reid Said “We Do Not Need To Bring A Budget To The Floor This Year.” “Senate Democratic leaders on Friday said they do not intend to bring a fiscal 2013 budget up for a floor vote. ‘We do not need to bring a budget to the floor this year - it’s done, we don’t need to do it,’ Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told reporters on Friday.” (Vicki Needham, “Reid: This Year’s Budget Is Done,” The Hill’s “On The Money,” 2/3/12)

Senate Democrats Have Not Passed A Budget For 1,072 Days, Since April 29, 2009. (S. Con. Res. 13, Roll Call 173; D 53-3, R 0-40, I 2-0, 4/29/09)

  • Only 51 Votes Are Required For A Budget To Pass. “Republicans jumped on Mr Lew, pointing out that under Congress’ budget procedure, a budget resolution cannot be filibustered and thus only needs a simple majority vote - typically 51 votes - to pass.” (“Why The Senate Hasn’t Passed A Budget,” The Economist’s “Free Exchange,” 2/15/12)

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney Says The White House Has “No Opinion” On Whether The Senate Should Pass A Budget. ABC NEWS’ JAKE TAPPER:The White House has no opinion about whether or not the Senate should pass a budget? The president’s going to introduce one. The Fed chair says not having one is bad for growth. But the White House has no opinion about whether - ” JAY CARNEY: I have no opinion - the White House has no opinion on Chairman Bernanke’s assessment of how the Senate ought to do its business.” (White House Press Briefing, 2/8/12)


A VIDEO

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) Confronted With Democratic Hypocrisy On Women

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos: “ Let me follow up on that. Because you’ve — this has clearly become a democratic theme this year and several democrats made a lot of hay with the comments of Rush Limbaugh last week, but some republicans are seeing hypocrisy there. I want to show a bit of an ad that’s being run by a group called ShePAC. Its aligned with Sarah Palin. They’re saying that democrats should be asking Bill Maher, the comedian to return back that $1 million to Obama’s super PAC because of his history of attacks on women. Take a look.

Ad: “Hi Bill Maher here. Sarah Palin agreed to do commentary at Fox news, which is actually very similar to her day job, talking to a baby with Down Syndrome. Speaking of dumb twats, it’s not because they have breasts, it’s because they are boobs.”

Stephanopoulos: “Should democrats give the money back?”

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY): Well, no, I mean, look the bottom line is, Rush Limbaugh’s comments were just nasty and directed at a particular young woman who had a particular point of view and was expressing herself. Bill Maher is a comedian. It’s much different. Rush Limbaugh has tremendous weight in the Republican party - no one will rebut him. Bill Maher is a comedian who is on at 11:00 at night but has very little influence on what’s happening here. So, again, they’re sort of in hole and they’re always trying to look for excuses.

(ABC’s “This Week” 3/11/12)