A VIDEO

Jen Psaki Blames the CIA for Benghazi Talking Points Four Times in Four Minutes

State Department Spokesperson Jen Psaki: “These Were CIA Points. They Were CIA Edited. They Were CIA Finalized.” STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESPERSON JENPSAKI: “Well, let me start by just reminding you that these were CIA points. They were CIA edited. They were CIA finalized. So the ultimate result of this was the best estimate, at the time, of the intel community.” (Jen Psaki, State Department Press Briefing, Washington, DC, 5/13/13)

  • Psaki: “These Were CIA Points Of The Intel Assessment At The Time. They Made The Decision About What The Final Points Were Going To Include.” STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESPERSON JENPSAKI: “There were issues that were raised. But, again, to go back to the bottom line point here: these were CIA points of the intel assessment at the time. They made the decision about what the final points were going to include. They did include information at the end that we later learned was inaccurate.” (Jen Psaki, State Department Press Briefing, Washington, DC, 5/13/13)
  • Psaki: “These Again Were CIA Talking Points.” REPORTER: “I thought the decisions about what would finally go into them were made by the Deputies Committee. Is that not correct?” STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESPERSON JENPSAKI: “These again were CIA talking points.” REPORTER: “I know that. But that’s not my question.” (Jen Psaki, State Department Press Briefing, Washington, DC, 5/13/13)
  • Psaki: “I’m Just Pointing You To The Fact That These Started And Ended As CIA Talking Points.” REPORTER: “My question is was the decision of what would be included and not included ultimately made by the Deputies Committee or, rather, by the CIA at its sole discretion?” STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESPERSON JENPSAKI: “I can’t parse that any farther.  These were, one, prior to my arrival here. But also that were made out of this building. But I’m just pointing you to the fact that these started and ended as CIA talking points.” (Jen Psaki, State Department Press Briefing, Washington, DC, 5/13/13)

A VIDEO

NBC’s David Gregory On Carney’s Explanation Of Benghazi Talking Point Revisions: “Not Accurate”

A VIDEO

Feinstein: White House Should Have Moved Faster To Call Benghazi A Terrorist Act

A VIDEO

Carney: Benghazi Happened a Long Time Ago

A TEXT POST

Obama’s Support For Israel Questioned By Voters

A New Poll Shows Increased Doubts About Obama’s Support For Israel

“Hill Poll: President’s Support For Israel Found Wanting By Many Voters.” (Lara Seligman, “Hill Poll: President’s Support For Israel Found Wanting By Many Voters,”The Hill, 3/4/13)

A Recent The Hill Poll Found That “Three Times As Many Voters Believe The Obama Administration Is Not Supportive Enough Of Israel As Believe It Is Too Supportive.” “Three times as many voters believe the Obama administration is not supportive enough of Israel as believe it is too supportive, according to a new poll for the Hill. The proportion of voters who now say the president does not give strong enough backing to Israel is higher than it was in each of three similar surveys conducted for The Hill since May 2011. Correspondingly, fewer voters now find the White House’s policy excessively supportive of Israel.” (Lara Seligman, “Hill Poll: President’s Support For Israel Found Wanting By Many Voters,” The Hill, 3/4/13)

  • “A Full 39 Percent Said Obama Is Not Supportive Enough, The Highest Percentage The Hill Poll Has Seen.” “According to the latest Hill Poll, just 13 percent of respondents say the president’s policy toward Israel is too supportive. A full 39 percent said Obama is not supportive enough, the highest percentage The Hill Poll has seen. Over the past two years, recent surveys for The Hill show a fluctuating number of voters who believe the president needs to express stronger support of Israel. In a poll for The Hill conducted in May 2011, 27 percent of voters said Obama was too supportive toward Israel, while 31 percent said he was not supportive enough.” (Lara Seligman, “Hill Poll: President’s Support For Israel Found Wanting By Many Voters,” The Hill, 3/4/13)
  • The Percentage Of Voters Who Believe Obama Is “Generally Anti-Israel” Remained Slightly Larger Than The Percentage Of Those Who Believe He Is Pro-Israel. “Meanwhile, in the most recent survey for The Hill, a slightly larger percentage of likely voters say Obama is generally anti-Israel than say he is pro-Israel, 30 percent to 28 percent. The percentage of voters who label Obama as pro-Israel is up slightly from a September 2011 survey for The Hill, as is the number of voters who say Obama is anti-Israel. Overall though, the data hasn’t changed much since 2011. In the September survey, 23 percent dubbed Obama pro-Israel, while 29 percent said the president was anti-Israel. In the most recent survey, 29 percent of likely voters said Obama is neither, which is a somewhat smaller figure than the 38 percent of voters who gave that answer in 2011.” (Lara Seligman, “Hill Poll: President’s Support For Israel Found Wanting By Many Voters,” The Hill, 3/4/13)

The Poll’s Results “Underline The American Public’s Concern About Obama’s Policy On The Jewish State At A Time Of Heightened Fears About Iran’s Nuclear Program.” “These findings underline the American public’s concern about Obama’s policy on the Jewish state at a time of heightened fears about Iran’s nuclear program. Israel has insisted that Iran must be stopped by any means necessary, including a military strike, from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The Obama administration has expressed its preference for a diplomatic solution, a posture that pro-Israel critics say is insufficiently muscular.” (Lara Seligman, “Hill Poll: President’s Support For Israel Found Wanting By Many Voters,”The Hill, 3/4/13)

Recent Surveys Also Showed That Voters Believe The U.S. Is Less Respected Internationally Under Obama

Overall, More Voters Now Believe That Obama Has Damaged U.S. Standing In The World, A Reversal From 2011 When 47 Percent Of Voters Believed He Had Improved The U.S. Image Abroad . “As Obama embarks on a second-term push to secure his place in history, the president is no doubt thinking about his global reputation. But according to a comparison of two recent surveys for The Hill, fewer voters now believe Obama has improved the United States’ standing in the world. In May 2011, 47 percent said Obama had improved the country’s standing, while 38 percent said Obama damaged the nation’s reputation. But in the Hill Poll’s most recent survey, just 37 percent said the United States is more respected internationally than it was prior to Obama taking office, while a full 43 percent said the country is less respected in the world.” (Lara Seligman, “Hill Poll: President’s Support For Israel Found Wanting By Many Voters,”The Hill, 3/4/13)

A VIDEO

White House Adviser Gene Sperling: We Did Put Forward The Framework Of Sequester

This Morning, White House Adviser Gene Sperling Admitted That The Obama White House Had Proposed The Framework Of The Sequester.NBC’s DAVID GREGORY: “Back in October, the president staked out some very clear ground in the presidential debate against Mitt Romney. Here’s what he said.” OBAMA: “First of all, the sequester is not something that I proposed. It’s something that Congress has proposed. It will not happen. The budget that we’re talking about is not reducing our military spending. It’s maintaining it.” GREGORY: “The White House has acknowledged that’s not accurate. The president did propose this. He didn’t want it to become law, and Republicans supported it, but it was the White House’s idea. He said there unequivocally it will not happen, and yet it’s happened. Is there some responsibility he bears for that?” WHITE HOUSE ADVISER GENE SPERLING: “David, Jonathan Chase of New York Magazine, you know, gave the following analogy. A mugger comes up to you and says, give me your wallet. You say, I don’t have my wallet but here’s my watch. Well, technically, giving your watch was your idea, but it doesn’t really tell the whole story. We know, everyone knows, that the president wanted an enforcement mechanism that included revenues on the most well off. The speaker insisted, the Republicans insisted that, it just be an enforcement mechanism that be on all spending cuts. Because we were forced to do, that it is true we suggested going back to the Graham Ruddman Hollings mechanism –” GREGORY: “That’s not what he said in the debate, he said I didn’t propose it.” SPERLING: “I think it’s most accurate that they did propose an all-spending cut mechanism that would have this type of harmful impacts on defense and on education and research. And the idea — and this is the critical part, the idea was not that these would go into effect but that people of good faith would come back and compromise. And we know that that is what’s important. Republicans aren’t getting a win by letting the sequester go into effect. They want more funding for border security. They say they want more funding for defense. The speaker says he wants more on long-term entitlement reform. This gets nothing. It gets long-term entitlement – ” GREGORY: “Was the president right or wrong in that clip that I just showed you?” SPERLING:  “I think the president was overall right in that the idea of an across the board all spending cut was the idea of Republicans. But, yes, we put forth the design of how to do that.”  GREGORY: “Which was the sequester.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press ,” 3/3/13)

A VIDEO

CNN: Growing Questions And Grumbling Among Democrats And Inside Pentagon About Chuck Hagel

A VIDEO

Woodward: Democrat Senators Calling WH To See If Hagel Is Going To Withdraw

A VIDEO

FLASHBACK: Obama Praises LG Chem: “Symbol Of Where America Is Going” 

A TEXT POST

SHOT/CHASER: Obama’s Chief Of Staff Taught Him How To Pass A Bill

SHOT: Obama Said His New Chief Of Staff, Denis McDonough, Taught Him How To Pass A Bill. OBAMA: “I am pleased to announce my next chief of staff, and a great friend to me and everybody who works here at the White House, Mr. Denis McDonough. Now I have been counting on Denis for nearly a decade. Since I first came to Washington, when he helped set up my Senate office, along with Pete Rouse, he was able to show me where the restrooms where, you know, how you passed a bill.” (President Barack Obama, Personnel Announcement, Washington, DC, 1/25/13)

CHASER: Obama Only Passed Two Bills While In The Senate.

During His Brief Senate Career, Obama Was The Lead Sponsor Of 122 Bills.

Only Two Of Obama’s Lead Sponsored Bills Became Law:

  • S.906: Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008
  • S.2125: Democratic Republic Of The Congo Relief, Security, And Democracy Promotion Act Of 2006